I'm uncomfortable with this. I don't feel like Song should be required to produce government documentation to back up her story. If she says that's how her R.O. is written why not simply believe her? Is anyone seriously debating this? My disagreement with her was over her generalization from her R.O. to all such orders. She accepts my personal experience, and I accept hers.

That said, I agree that most people (including myself) have little to no experience with these things and it might be worthwhile to educate ourselves. But that's an obligation on us, not on Song.