Note: you're apparently missing a close tag -- the link to the Post op-ed runs through the end of your post.
But yeah, largely agreed. The only point where I think there's a hope of things looking brighter is that I'm not at all sure it will take an *actual* Republican loss in 2018 to bring him down: if it looks like he is dragging enough vulnerable House members down to a loss, that *might* just be enough to get a critical mass of them behind impeachment.
No clue on the odds there, but it wouldn't surprise me. And this is one of the most delicious examples pushing in that direction, because it seriously undermines the Republicans' claim to be the party of national security...
no subject
But yeah, largely agreed. The only point where I think there's a hope of things looking brighter is that I'm not at all sure it will take an *actual* Republican loss in 2018 to bring him down: if it looks like he is dragging enough vulnerable House members down to a loss, that *might* just be enough to get a critical mass of them behind impeachment.
No clue on the odds there, but it wouldn't surprise me. And this is one of the most delicious examples pushing in that direction, because it seriously undermines the Republicans' claim to be the party of national security...