For the serious grammarians
Those of you who think creative spelling is amusing and refer to the punctuation-aware with pejorative terms can just skip right along.
Now, for the rest of us, I quote a sentence from a recent BBC New story:
I find the use of question mark-comma particularly odd. If that's appropriate, why not end the sentence with a period? Why not put the song titles in quotes, or at least italics? Discuss!
(original here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/5310416.stm, link courtesy of
coslinks)
Now, for the rest of us, I quote a sentence from a recent BBC New story:
Banksy has replaced Hilton's CD with his own remixes and given them titles such as Why am I Famous?, What Have I Done? and What Am I For?
I find the use of question mark-comma particularly odd. If that's appropriate, why not end the sentence with a period? Why not put the song titles in quotes, or at least italics? Discuss!
(original here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/5310416.stm, link courtesy of
no subject
no subject
no subject
...such as "Why Am I Famous?", "What Have I Done?", and "What Am I For?"
I'd leave off the final period because there is already a sentence-ending piece of punctuation there, the question mark.
I must toss this one at my mother; she was an English teacher. I'd be interested to see her insights.
no subject
As for the "all inside" rule, that's been superceded. The rule these days is that you put punctuation inside if it's relevant to the quote otherwise not.
So: He yelled "Get out of here!" at me.
and: He said something like "Get out".
are considered acceptable. See Eats, Shoots, and Leaves.
no subject
no subject
I like to think the best of people, until I have evidence otherwise.
no subject