A linguistic fancy
Dec. 26th, 2008 05:48 pmIntuitively it seems like there should be a large number of such pairs, but
Polish (people from Poland) and polish (to give a shine to)
Moor (ancient Arabs) and moor (a marshy type of land)
Reading (city name) and reading (the act of consuming a book)
Can my erudite readers come up with more such pairs?
ETA: WotW has two good ones in comments, and there's a whole class of people names that fit the rule but that I hadn't thought of.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-26 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-26 11:25 pm (UTC)Also Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Vixen and Comet.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-26 11:02 pm (UTC)of an example. It is my understanding that the city of Buffalo
takes its name from the French expression meaning "beautiful
water" and has nothing to do with the bison.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-26 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-26 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-26 11:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-26 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-26 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-26 11:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-26 11:28 pm (UTC)This reminds me of when I was about 9 and playing Scrabble with my family, and I'd put down a proper noun (I forget what the word was at this point). My brother said, "you can't use proper nouns!" I asked what that was. He explained, "it's like a regular noun but the first letter is capitalized, like countries and stuff".
To which I replied, "but the letters are ALL capitals!"
'cause in Scrabble they are. :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-26 11:33 pm (UTC)Romance (family of languages including French, Italian, and Rumanian) vs. romance (love story)
Constitutional (relating to a meta-law document) vs. constitutional (brisk exercize)
Herb (man's name derived from Herbert) vs. herb (aromatic greenery used in cooking)
That's all I got for now.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-26 11:44 pm (UTC)Constitutional, as in the walk, is related to a person's constitution, which I believe is the same root formation. I'd have to go to the OED for that one.
See above about names.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-26 11:42 pm (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo
no subject
Date: 2008-12-28 08:21 pm (UTC)Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo.
for what it's worth.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 12:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 12:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 12:16 am (UTC)they both derive from Augustus.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 12:24 am (UTC)(a real animal with antlers that walks on four legs)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 02:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 12:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 01:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 12:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 01:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 12:58 am (UTC)Presumably cardinal (the bird) has a derivation related to that of
Cardinal (the church official) (both being related to the color red)
but I conjecture that cardinal (the number) has a separate derivation
and therefore this example counts.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 01:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 01:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 01:12 am (UTC)Or is it possible these share a derivation?
no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 01:53 am (UTC)I can't find any etymology for the top of the house meaning, though.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 01:18 am (UTC)boys)
And if Belch doesn't mean hailing from Belgium, well it damn well should.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 01:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 01:32 am (UTC)she's just guessing.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 01:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 01:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 02:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 04:13 pm (UTC)I hope this one hasn't been used...
Mars (the planet) and mars (defaces)
later
Tom
no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 04:37 pm (UTC)Mister (form of address for a man, as in "Hey, Mister") and mister (a spray
bottle)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-27 04:40 pm (UTC)In meaning A, the word is capitalized
In meaning B, the word is not capitalized
In meaning C, the word is not capitalized
Meanings A and B have a shared etymology; meaning C is quite separate.
Then do I get to use the pair A/C, or does the existence of the pair
A/B disqualify A/C?
Pseudo-example:
A: Boxer (member of a Chinese secret society)
B: boxer (pugilist)
C: boxer (one who puts things in boxes)
A and B have the same etymology. Can I still use A/C? (In this case
probably not, because I'm guessing B/C also share an etymology---pugilists
contend in box-shaped arenas. But what if that weren't the case?)
In view of this ambiguity in the rules, I think we need to erase the entire
thread, get a clarification and start all over.