On the business of life
Jan. 18th, 2007 10:46 amI'm mostly dumping this here so I can reference it later, but commentary is welcome. This came out of a discussion of the relationship of WiiTID to the profitability of the enterprises that employ people like me:
Profit is like health, to a corporation. You have to have it, and more is good. But it's not the reason for existence.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 04:30 pm (UTC)The only exception are the two classes of Owners who build buildings intended to lose money from the start - governments and school districts.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 04:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 11:17 pm (UTC)Though, in fairness, unless your time frame for turning over a property is fairly short (say, three years or under) chosing to maximize enjoyment is rational, insofar as it becomes extremely difficult to predict what features will be considered desirable by consumers in the more distant future. It could also be construed as rational in that you're more likely to want to take care of a house you like over the long haul, and thus preserve its value.