We saw "Brave" and it was... okay
Jul. 16th, 2012 11:06 amI've been known to assert that Disney could spoil a wet dream. Aside from the sexism and the other -isms that their movies are rife with, they pillage good stories and run them through a pap mill resulting in saccharine awful crap. Fortunately this seems not to have happened here. Mostly I thought it was an OK movie, but for Pixar it was not particularly stellar.
My biggest problem is that it's too goddamn preachy. The movie isn't simply happy to tell its story. Oh, no. It has to beat you over the head, repeatedly, with its MORAL and IMPORTANT LESSONS. When I find myself - during the climactic emotional scene - staring at the main character's hair and thinking "nice job, animators" rather than paying attention to the actual movie you know it's not good.
First off, I should say that the movie does clear the admittedly low bar that has been set for it. It's a self-rescuing princess, a Disney first, with two likable parents; also, I think, a Disney first though I might be wrong about that. The voicing is good - particularly Emma Thompson as Elinor - and the animators clearly did their homework when they went to Scotland. The long and medium landscape shots are all brilliantly evocative; you feel like you're watching a National Geographic film of the country.
The script itself is not per-se awful and there are one or two real laugh-out-loud moments. Kilts, tower... need I say more? The problem is that it doesn't have a lot of real good moments. The witch was straight out of Central Casting and something of a waste.
The film also seems to have problems figuring out just how realistic vs fantastic it wants to be. Brave has some advanced and realistic animated bits (the landscapes and aforementioned hair, for example) and Merida in general is rendered somewhat realistically. But then you put that on the same screen as obvious cartoon characters with stick legs, caricature-exaggerated faces, and goofy anatomies and I got a real uncanny valley effect.
I'm not sorry I saw it, but I'm unlikely to see it again.
My biggest problem is that it's too goddamn preachy. The movie isn't simply happy to tell its story. Oh, no. It has to beat you over the head, repeatedly, with its MORAL and IMPORTANT LESSONS. When I find myself - during the climactic emotional scene - staring at the main character's hair and thinking "nice job, animators" rather than paying attention to the actual movie you know it's not good.
First off, I should say that the movie does clear the admittedly low bar that has been set for it. It's a self-rescuing princess, a Disney first, with two likable parents; also, I think, a Disney first though I might be wrong about that. The voicing is good - particularly Emma Thompson as Elinor - and the animators clearly did their homework when they went to Scotland. The long and medium landscape shots are all brilliantly evocative; you feel like you're watching a National Geographic film of the country.
The script itself is not per-se awful and there are one or two real laugh-out-loud moments. Kilts, tower... need I say more? The problem is that it doesn't have a lot of real good moments. The witch was straight out of Central Casting and something of a waste.
The film also seems to have problems figuring out just how realistic vs fantastic it wants to be. Brave has some advanced and realistic animated bits (the landscapes and aforementioned hair, for example) and Merida in general is rendered somewhat realistically. But then you put that on the same screen as obvious cartoon characters with stick legs, caricature-exaggerated faces, and goofy anatomies and I got a real uncanny valley effect.
I'm not sorry I saw it, but I'm unlikely to see it again.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 10:39 pm (UTC)We may be having some rupture over the definition of "preaching." I'm referring to "warning an incipient adolescent of various traps waiting for her as her internal brain (and other chemistry) starts to change." So an extended metaphor about snap decisions with vague goals backfiring badly is good education.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 01:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 10:17 pm (UTC)Oddly the hair was distracting for me too. I wouldn't have changed it... I think it is a sign that we are getting close to "Looker"-like CGI situations.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 03:43 pm (UTC)The story was okay, I guess -- cute, sometimes funny, fairly enjoyable.
Personally, though, I am almost as tired of the spunky, non-traditional, parent-defying Disney Princesses as I was of the picture-perfect, compliant ones.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 07:00 pm (UTC)Someone said that they had a good core script that should have been under an hour long and tried to stretch it to nearly two hours instead; that struck a chord with me.
I definitely enjoyed it and wasn't let down, but I was hoping for more out of it.
The pixar short at the start though? Fan-freakin-tastic. :)
no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 07:07 pm (UTC)I liked it a lot.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 08:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 08:15 pm (UTC)